From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 23, 2020
185 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

110882

07-23-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert BURT, Appellant.

G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H. Willis of counsel), for respondent.


G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H. Willis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Mulvey, Devine, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Sypniewski, J.), rendered August 10, 2018, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was required to waive the right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant to 3½ years in prison, to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we disagree. We find that there is at least one issue of arguable merit with respect to the validity of defendant's appeal waiver that may potentially impact other issues that may be raised, such as the severity of the sentence (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565–566, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019] ; People v. Barrales, 179 A.D.3d 1313, 1314–1315, 118 N.Y.S.3d 263 [2020] ). Accordingly, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v. Beaty, 22 N.Y.3d 490, 492–493, 982 N.Y.S.2d 820, 5 N.E.3d 983 [2014] ; People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 638–639, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ; see generally People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 980, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Mulvey, Devine, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.


Summaries of

People v. Burt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 23, 2020
185 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Burt

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Burt, Appellant.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 2020

Citations

185 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 4208
125 N.Y.S.3d 902

Citing Cases

People v. Murphy

Upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we disagree. To that end, we perceive at least one issue…