From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burns-Perry

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 26, 2012
SC: 145374 (Mich. Dec. 26, 2012)

Opinion

SC: 145374 COA: 306814 Oakland CC: 2003-193006-FC

12-26-2012

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRANDON JUSTIN BURNS-PERRY, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

145374 & (23)(24)

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra,

Justices

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand for resentencing is DENIED without prejudice to any relief that the defendant may seek under Miller v Alabama, 567 US ___; 132 S Ct 2455; 183 L Ed 2d 407 (2012).

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

__________

Clerk


Summaries of

People v. Burns-Perry

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 26, 2012
SC: 145374 (Mich. Dec. 26, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Burns-Perry

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRANDON JUSTIN…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 26, 2012

Citations

SC: 145374 (Mich. Dec. 26, 2012)