Opinion
January 27, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
As defendant never sought a bill of particulars, he cannot now complain about the alleged inaccuracy of the information in the bill of particulars which was furnished in response to his codefendant's request (see, People v Foster, 64 N.Y.2d 1144, cert denied ___ US ___, 106 S Ct 166). In any event, defendant suffered no prejudice as a result of the inaccuracy (see, People v Petterson, 103 A.D.2d 811; People v Ames, 115 A.D.2d 543).
We have reviewed defendant's other contentions and find that they are unpreserved or without merit (see, CPL 470.05; People v Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865). Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.