From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 8, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-8

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert BURKS, appellant.

Robert Burks, Auburn, N.Y., appellant pro se. *773 Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Ruth E. Ross of counsel), for respondent.


Robert Burks, Auburn, N.Y., appellant pro se. *773 Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Ruth E. Ross of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 15, 2000 ( People v. Burks, 272 A.D.2d 476, 708 N.Y.S.2d 318), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 3, 1998.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Burks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 8, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Burks

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert BURKS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1030 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3659
943 N.Y.S.2d 772