From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1297) KA 00-02667.

November 9, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Fahey, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.)

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., SCUDDER, BURNS, GORSKI AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

By failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty to burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30) or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was not voluntarily, intelligently or knowingly entered ( see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. DeJesus, 248 A.D.2d 1023, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 879). In any event, that contention is without merit. Contrary to defendant's contention, there is no requirement that defendant personally recite the facts underlying the crime ( see, People v. Every, 272 A.D.2d 947, 947-948, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 865; People v. Kinch, 237 A.D.2d 830, 831, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 860; see generally, People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 353-355).


Summaries of

People v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RAYMOND BURKE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 9, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 614

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

In any event, that challenge lacks merit. "[T]here is no requirement that a defendant personally recite the…

People v. Shumway

Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily, and…