From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1985
115 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 2, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sharpe, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The trial court's evidentiary rulings were either correct (see, People v Love, 92 A.D.2d 551) or the claimed errors were unpreserved for review and, if incorrect, constituted harmless error (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969). Nor does the alleged prosecutorial misconduct warrant reversal (see, People v Caruso, 45 N.Y.2d 881). The sentence imposed, although the maximum permissible, was not an abuse of discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Gibbons, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1985
115 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HIRAM BURKE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)