From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burgos

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2021-03604 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2021-03604 Ind. 52/17

06-09-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Andrew Burgos, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Jose David Rodriguez Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant. Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Jose David Rodriguez Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for respondent.

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (William E. Garnett, J.), rendered October 27, 2017, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant by the complainant. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People met their burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the complainant's observations of the defendant during the incident provided an independent basis for her in-court identification of the defendant (see People v Gray, 135 A.D.3d 874, 874; People v Small, 110 A.D.3d 1106, 1106-1107).

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without assigning new counsel. Contrary to the defendant's contention, defense counsel did not take a position adverse to that of the defendant with respect to the motion (see People v Lopez-Perez, 128 A.D.3d 1093; People v Caple, 279 A.D.2d 635, 636).

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Burgos

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2021-03604 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Burgos

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Andrew Burgos…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-03604 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)