From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burgos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1995
212 A.D.2d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 2, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Vincent Vitale, J.).


Testimony at the suppression hearing established that there was no police-arranged identification procedure in this case. Defendant's argument that the complainant's identification of defendant may have been made in circumstances other than those testified to constituted mere speculation, and thus the hearing court appropriately exercised its discretion in denying defendant's application to call the complainant at the hearing (see, People v. Taylor, 80 N.Y.2d 1, 15).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Burgos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1995
212 A.D.2d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Burgos

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICARDO BURGOS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 99