From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 1999
262 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 17, 1999

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett III, J.), rendered January 28, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree.

Marcel J. Lajoy, Schenectady, for appellant.

James Sacket, District Attorney, Schoharie, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MIKOLL, YESAWICH JR., CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of depraved indifference murder (Penal Law § 125.25) in satisfaction of,inter alia, a multicount indictment relating to the death of an eight-month-old infant placed in defendant's care who died from blunt force injuries to her head and torso. Pursuant to his plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal. The only commitment County Court made was to set a ceiling of a sentence of 20 years to life in prison, with a promise to afford defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea in the event that it deemed that a harsher sentence was appropriate. The court ultimately sentenced defendant to a prison term of 20 years to life and defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Inasmuch as defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty, his contention that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive has not been preserved for our review (see, People v. Buchanan, 236 A.D.2d 741, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1032). In any event, were we to consider the argument, we would find it to be unpersuasive. Given defendant's history, the terms of the negotiated plea agreement and the circumstances surrounding the brutal death of a helpless infant, we would find that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive, despite the fact that the People recommended a lesser sentence. Furthermore, there are no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction thereof in the interest of justice (see, People v. Charles, 258 A.D.2d 740, 685 N.Y.S.2d 853). We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Burg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 1999
262 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Burg

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE T. BURG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 243

Citing Cases

People v. Newell

This appeal ensued. Initially, a review of the plea allocution reveals that defendant entered a knowing,…

People v. Flint

In the absence of an abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances, the sentence imposed by the…