From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Buford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2008
56 A.D.3d 381 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4665.

November 25, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered April 25, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration. Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ellen Dille of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Martin J. Foncello of counsel), for respondent.

Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.


The court's upward departure to risk level two is based on clear and convincing evidence ( see generally Correction Law § 168-n). The court properly concluded that defendant's history of psychiatric illness and medication noncompliance enhanced his risk of reoffending. In making that finding, the court appropriately considered the report of a CPL article 730 examination prepared in connection with the underlying conviction, including statements made by defendant during his examination. There is nothing in the record to cast any doubt on the reliability of this information. In any event, the information about defendant's psychiatric background that was undisputed at the classification proceeding would have been sufficient to support the court's upward departure.


Summaries of

People v. Buford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 25, 2008
56 A.D.3d 381 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Buford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANNY BUFORD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 25, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 381 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9276
868 N.Y.S.2d 39

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Defendant failed to preserve his contention that the court erred by relying upon his CPL 730 exam to assess…

People v. Powell

The SORA court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 for defendant's history of drug abuse based…