holding that a prosecutor's comments to the jury that a defendant's presence in the courtroom provided him the opportunity to fabricate evidence impermissibly infringed on a defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights
Summary of this case from Shulick v. McKeeDecided January 27, 1984
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
holding that a prosecutor's comments to the jury that a defendant's presence in the courtroom provided him the opportunity to fabricate evidence impermissibly infringed on a defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights
Summary of this case from Shulick v. McKeeFull title:PEOPLE v. BUCKLEY (DAVID)
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jan 27, 1984
In support of his argument, Petitioner cites a variety of Michigan Court of Appeals decisions. See People v.…