From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bryant

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2024
223 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

1436 Ind. No. 480/19 Case No. 2022–01446

01-16-2024

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Amere BRYANT, Defendant–Appellant.

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Clara Hammond–Oakley of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Elliott Robert Hamilton of counsel), for respondent.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Clara Hammond–Oakley of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Elliott Robert Hamilton of counsel), for respondent.

Moulton, J.P., Kapnick, Scarpulla, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph A. Fabrizio, J.), rendered April 06, 2022,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Bryant

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2024
223 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Bryant

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Amere Bryant…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

223 A.D.3d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 172
201 N.Y.S.3d 405

Citing Cases

People v. Strub

[2, 3] Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly denied that branch of the…

People v. Strub

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's…