People v. Bryan A. (In re Bryan A.)

Full title: In re BRYAN A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE…

Court: COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Date published: Dec 28, 2012

B239580 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 28, 2012)

Opinion

B239580

12-28-2012

In re BRYAN A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRYAN A., Defendant and Appellant.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. FJ46517)

THE COURT:^*

* BOREN, P. J., DOI TODD, J., CHAVEZ, J.

Bryan A., a minor, appeals from the order declaring him a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 by reason of his having committed battery (Pen. Code, § 243, subd. (a)). The trial court committed him to a residential facility, with a maximum term of confinement of six months.

The matter arose from the following facts. On November 11, 2009, appellant's mother, G.A., asked him to do his laundry. Two hours later when G.A. did not see the laundry done she asked again. Appellant had hidden his dirty laundry behind the bathroom sink but pretended to look for it in the kitchen. An argument ensued and appellant got up close to G.A. and intimidated her. G.A. raised a plastic sandal above her head "to stop him because he was starting to become violent." Appellant picked up a folding chair and pushed G.A. with the chair. G.A. suffered a broken nail and her hand was hurt as a result of appellant's actions.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an "Opening Brief" in which no issues were raised.

On October 9, 2012, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The order appealed from is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.