From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bruno

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Sep 21, 2018
61 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

570728/14

09-21-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Akmel BRUNO, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Steven M. Statsinger, J.), rendered July 16, 2014, affirmed.

The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant "advance[d] toward [complainant] while swinging a knife at him" were sufficient to charge defendant with menacing in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.14[1] ). The manner in which the knife was used qualified it as a dangerous instrument, even though the knife was not described with particularity (see People v. Carter , 53 NY2d 113 [1981] ; Matter of Jonathan M. , 4 AD3d 154 [2004] ). The factual allegations also supported an inference that defendant intended to place complainant in reasonable fear of physical injury (see People v. Bracey , 41 NY2d 296 [1977] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Bruno

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Sep 21, 2018
61 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

People v. Bruno

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Akmel Bruno…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Sep 21, 2018

Citations

61 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 51335
110 N.Y.S.3d 775