From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bruner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 7, 1992

Appeal from the Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err when it sentenced defendant in absentia. Defendant had been informed of the scheduled date for sentencing but, rather than appearing, chose to abscond to Texas. Defendant's flight from the jurisdiction unambiguously indicated "a defiance of the processes of law sufficient to effect a forfeiture" of his right to be present at sentencing (People v Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436, 444; see also, People v Corley, 67 N.Y.2d 105, 109-110).

We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Bruner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Bruner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SCOTT D. BRUNER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Roe

Though defendant was adequately warned of the consequences of absconding, and it is better practice to do so,…

People v. Roe

Though defendant was adequately warned of the consequences of absconding, and it is better practice to do so,…