From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brundidge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 11, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of second degree murder for the shooting death of her husband. On appeal she argues that errors in the court's charge require reversal. We disagree. The court's charges on justification and extreme emotional disturbance, when read in their entirety, adequately and properly conveyed to the jury the elements of each claim (see, People v. Crosby, 115 A.D.2d 988, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 941). Defendant's challenge to the court's charge on circumstantial evidence was not preserved for review and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. We have considered defendant's remaining claims that were preserved for review and find them lacking in merit.


Summaries of

People v. Brundidge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Brundidge

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLINE O. BRUNDIDGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 1192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)