From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 19, 2019
173 A.D.3d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2017–04830 Ind. No. 8094/15

06-19-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Patrick BROWN, Appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Anna Kou of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel; Ruby D. Andrade on the memorandum), for respondent.

LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, JEFFREY A. COHEN, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERAppeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruce M. Balter, J.), imposed January 11, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the record does not reflect that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; see also People v. Jones, 158 A.D.3d 775, 68 N.Y.S.3d 769 ; People v. Policastro, 142 A.D.3d 679, 36 N.Y.S.3d 827 ). Given the defendant's inexperience with the criminal justice system, the Supreme Court's terse colloquy at the plea allocution as to the waiver of his right to appeal was insufficient. Further, the court lumped the waiver of the right to appeal into the panoply of rights normally forfeited upon a plea of guilty, rendering the waiver unintelligent, unknowing, and involuntary (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d at 264–265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; cf. People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ). Thus, the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude appellate review of his excessive sentence claim.

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

AUSTIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 19, 2019
173 A.D.3d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Patrick Brown…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4964
100 N.Y.S.3d 891