Opinion
March 19, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.).
Defendant's probation was revoked after he was convicted of two subsequent charges and pled guilty, to violating probation.
Defendant's contention that the plea allocution was insufficient in various respects is unpreserved in the absence of a motion to vacate the plea pursuant to CPL article 440, and we decline to review in the interest of justice where defendant's plea of guilty to a violation of probation was made through his attorney in open court and in his presence (People v Holt, 155 A.D.2d 338, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 736).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.