From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 15, 2017
147 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

02-15-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Oneick A. BROWN, appellant.

Michael A. Ciaffa, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Yael V. Levy and W. Thomas Hughes of counsel), for respondent.


Michael A. Ciaffa, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Yael V. Levy and W. Thomas Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered June 25, 2015, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that he should be afforded the opportunity to move for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty because he did not receive the sentence that had been promised is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant did not move for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty on that basis (see People v. Collier, 71 A.D.3d 909, 911, 895 N.Y.S.2d 848 ). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, there is no basis in the record to conclude that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 15, 2017
147 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Oneick A. BROWN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

147 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
147 A.D.3d 969
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 1220

Citing Cases

People v. Munoz-Zuleta

In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and…

People v. Munoz-Zuleta

The defendant's contention that he did not receive the sentence that had been promised pursuant to his plea…