From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 12, 2016
138 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-12-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marvin BROWN, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Courtney M. Wen of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Courtney M. Wen of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J. at dismissal motion; Harold Rothwax, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered November 15, 1995, convicting defendant of absconding from temporary release in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). The circumstances surrounding defendant's failure to comply with the reporting requirement of his work release program support the inference that defendant acted intentionally.

The motion court, after considering the Taranovich factors (People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 373 N.Y.S.2d 79, 335 N.E.2d 303 [1975] ), properly determined that although the 26–month prearrest delay was lengthy, and although defendant could have been charged sooner, the delay was not intended to obtain a tactical advantage relating to the absconding charge, but was the result of a determination, made in good faith, that a continuing homicide investigation required deferral of the absconding prosecution (see People v. Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241, 254, 405 N.Y.S.2d 17, 376 N.E.2d 179 [1978] ). Defendant did not experience any period of pretrial incarceration due to the absconding charge, and he was not prejudiced by the delay (see People v. Decker, 13 N.Y.3d 12, 884 N.Y.S.2d 662, 912 N.E.2d 1041 [2009] ).

FRIEDMAN, J.P., SWEENY, SAXE, RICHTER, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 12, 2016
138 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marvin BROWN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 12, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
138 A.D.3d 491
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2737

Citing Cases

People v. Wiggins

The above chronology shows that much of the delay was occasioned by requests for adjournments by defendant…

People v. Brown

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 138 AD3d 491 (NY)…