Opinion
April 1, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.).
Judgments affirmed.
The defendant did not assert his objections to the adequacy of the plea allocutions in the court of first instance and therefore failed, as a matter of law, to preserve his claim for appellate review ( see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Warren, 47 N.Y.2d 740; People v. Santiago, 100 A.D.2d 857). In any event, it is quite clear from the record that the guilty pleas were the products of defendant's informed and voluntary consent. Likewise, defendant's objection to the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence is without merit, for the count in the indictment to which the suppression motion pertained was dismissed by the court upon motion of the People. Thus, the denial of the motion was in no way prejudicial to defendant. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.