Opinion
May 4, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Although the defendant alleges that several errors occurred during his trial, the majority of these alleged errors were not objected to, and thus are not preserved for our review. In any event, the alleged errors are either without merit or harmless in light of the overwhelming proof of the defendant's guilt. The consistent and unimpeached testimony of the two complaining witnesses clearly established the defendant's guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
We have considered the issues raised in the defendant's pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit (see, United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463). Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.