From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 2003
1 A.D.3d 147 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2162

November 13, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered May 23, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree (five counts), sodomy in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the first degree (three counts), burglary in the first degree (three counts), burglary in the second degree, robbery in the third degree and sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 275 years, unanimously affirmed.

Ann Donnelly, for respondent.

Jojo Annobil, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sullivan, Marlow, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion when it inquired whether the jury, after deliberating for six hours, had agreed upon a verdict as to any of the multiple counts submitted, and when it then accepted a partial verdict (see People v. Mendez, 221 A.D.2d 162, 163, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 923). There was nothing coercive or prejudicial about the court's actions (see Bordas v. Walker, 2000 WL 1867915, 2000 US Dist LEXIS 18324 [SDNY Dec 21, 2000]). Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 2003
1 A.D.3d 147 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENDALL BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 147 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

People v. Vining

The court's brief response to the jury note provides no basis for reversal where the court immediately…

People v. Oleman

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in accepting a partial verdict ( see…