From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 21, 1997.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J., at trial; Dorothy Cropper, J., at post-judgment Wade hearing), rendered January 24, 1992, as amended October 25, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied after a hearing which followed the Court of Appeals remittitur ( 86 NY2d 728). The record establishes that the police did not make any suggestive use of the jacket and hat in question, and that the presence of the victim's sister had no effect on the victim's identifications of defendant. The showups were otherwise permissible ( see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541). Defendant's remaining arguments are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARTHUR BROWN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
652 N.Y.S.2d 710

Citing Cases

People v. Summers

Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The identification procedure was not unduly suggestive,…

People v. Mesa

Defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The fact that defendant was…