From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1989
147 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 14, 1989

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In this case the defendant's written waiver of his right to a jury trial was executed in accordance with constitutional and statutory requisites (see, N Y Const, art I, § 2; CPL 320.10; People v Duchin, 12 N.Y.2d 351). Further, because the defendant himself sought to have the jury trial terminated he waived his present claim that the subsequent bench trial constituted double jeopardy (see, United States v Scott, 437 U.S. 82; People v Ferguson, 67 N.Y.2d 383; People v Lawton, 134 A.D.2d 454; CPL 40.30).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1989
147 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRED BROWN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

State v. Nicholson

Here, it cannot be said that the defendant consented to the mistrial since his jury waiver was invalid. It…

People v. Thomas

The defendant's contention that his waiver of the right to a jury trial was invalid is unpreserved for…