From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1992
183 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 21, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.).


Defendant's conviction is not against the weight of the evidence, given that he was seen breaking into an apartment by a civilian witness and observed inside the apartment by a police officer acquainted with him, and made inculpatory statements en route to the precinct. Nor did the trial court abuse its sentencing discretion (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302). Not only should the particular acts by which a crime is committed be taken into account, but also the defendant's character and propensities, here elucidated by a very unfavorable presentence report. It is clear that the court's sentencing decision did not give improper weight to defendant's absence from the trial and sentencing.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 21, 1992
183 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES BROWN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 21, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 31

Citing Cases

People v. Rogha

That defendant was subsequently found incompetent to stand trial on three other indictments almost a year…

People v. Ennis

The fact that defendant received a harsher sentence after trial than he was offered during plea negotiations…