From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brooks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-11

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Luther BROOKS, appellant.


Luther Brooks, Napanoch, N.Y., appellant pro se.Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Seth M. Lieberman, and Marie–Claude P. Wrenn–Myers of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 9, 1998 ( People v. Brooks, 247 A.D.2d 486, 669 N.Y.S.2d 294), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 19, 1995.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, SKELOS and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brooks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Luther BROOKS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7233
930 N.Y.S.2d 913