From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brooks

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 29, 1971
192 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 9911.

Decided June 29, 1971.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Robert F. Mitchell, Jr., for defendant on appeal.

Before: QUINN, P.J., and McGREGOR and BRONSON, JJ.


The people have filed a motion to affirm. A review of the briefs and record in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Affirmed.

McGREGOR, J., concurred.


For the reasons stated in my dissent in People v. Martin (1970), 29 Mich. App. 295, I dissent.


Summaries of

People v. Brooks

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 29, 1971
192 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. BROOKS

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 29, 1971

Citations

192 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
192 N.W.2d 1