Opinion
570972/02.
Decided March 17, 2004.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court, New York County, rendered August 12, 2002 after a jury trial (Ruth Pickholz, J.) convicting him of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 265.01), menacing in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.14), endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [two counts]), and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [three counts]), and imposing sentence.
Judgment of conviction rendered August 12, 2002 (Ruth Pickholz, J.) affirmed.
PRESENT: HON. LUCINDO SUAREZ, P.J., HON. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, HON. MARTIN SCHOENFELD, Justices.
Defendant's challenges to the court's justification charge are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the charge as a whole conveyed the appropriate legal principles concerning the defendant's subjective beliefs and that no further summarization of the evidence was warranted ( see, People v. Hart, 298 AD2d 119; lv denied 99 NY2d 559; People v. Zayas, 283 AD2d 328; lv denied 96 NY2d 926).
This constitutes the decision and order of the court.