In any event, the record reveals that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16; People v Donovan, 133 A.D.3d at 615). The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to make any pretrial motions to suppress evidence is not properly before this Court, since by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not directly involve the plea negotiation process or sentencing (see People v Brooks, 192 A.D.3d 1134, 1134; People v Castro, 192 A.D.3d 1041, 1041; People v Fields, 178 A.D.3d 847, 848; People v Donovan, 133 A.D.3d at 615). The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
In any event, the record reveals that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (seePeople v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170 ; People v. Donovan, 133 A.D.3d at 615, 20 N.Y.S.3d 96 ). The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to make any pretrial motions to suppress evidence is not properly before this Court, since by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not directly involve the plea negotiation process or sentencing (seePeople v. Brooks, 192 A.D.3d 1134, 1134, 141 N.Y.S.3d 367 ; People v. Castro, 192 A.D.3d 1041, 1041, 140 N.Y.S.3d 759 ; People v. Fields, 178 A.D.3d 847, 848, 111 N.Y.S.3d 904 ; People v. Donovan, 133 A.D.3d at 615, 20 N.Y.S.3d 96 ). The sentence imposed was not excessive (seePeople v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
In any event, the record reveals that the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16; People v Donovan, 133 A.D.3d at 615). The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to make any pretrial motions to suppress evidence is not properly before this Court, since by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not directly involve the plea negotiation process or sentencing (see People v Brooks, 192 A.D.3d 1134, 1134; People v Castro, 192 A.D.3d 1041, 1041; People v Fields, 178 A.D.3d 847, 848; People v Donovan, 133 A.D.3d at 615). The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).