From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bronsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1963
21 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

November 12, 1963


Motion by defendant for reargument of his appeal from judgment of conviction entered in November, 1948, and for assignment of counsel for such purpose. Motion denied. Upon the defendant's appeal, we affirmed the judgment on October 24, 1949 ( People v. Bronsky, 275 N.Y. 1060 ). On this motion for reargument defendant seeks to raise only the question of the excessiveness of his sentence. That question could and should have been raised on the original appeal. It may not be tested now, either by way of reargument or coram nobis. Defendant cannot, in this indirect manner, obtain a second review of the 1948 judgment of conviction. Beldock, P.J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bronsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1963
21 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

People v. Bronsky

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SIDNEY BRONSKY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1963

Citations

21 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

People v. Witherspoon

People v. Corso, 40 NY2d 578, 580(1976); People v. Romain, 288 AD2d 242, 243(2001); People v. Gurlakis, 160…

People v. Cunningham

On appeal, the defendant contends that this sentence should have been set aside pursuant to CPL 440.20…