From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Britt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-09705.

October 20, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), dated October 20, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Samantha Baer on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly assessed points for risk factor 7 because he was a stranger to the victim ( see People v Lewis, 45 AD3d 1381; People v Penson, 38 AD3d 866, 867; Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 12 [2006] [hereinafter Guidelines]). Furthermore, the court properly assessed points for risk factor 11, given the defendant's admission regarding his alcohol usage at the time of the offense ( see People v Carpenter, 60 AD3d 833; People v Robinson, 55 AD3d 708; Guidelines at 15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Britt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2009
66 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Britt

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IESA BRITT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7604
886 N.Y.S.2d 622

Citing Cases

People v. Sterling

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof that the appellant was to…

People v. Palmer

DECISION ORDER Contrary to the defendant's contention, in determining his risk level under the Sex Offender…