From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bristow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2000
272 A.D.2d 55 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 2, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered October 9, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Kerry Chicon, for Respondent.

Julie Sender, for Defendant-Appellant.

SULLIVAN, P.J., ROSENBERGER, WILLIAMS, WALLACH, BUCKLEY, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification. The arrest photographs received in evidence were relevant to issues raised at trial and were not prejudicial. Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Bristow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 2, 2000
272 A.D.2d 55 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Bristow

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EARL BRISTOW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 2, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 55 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 318

Citing Cases

People v. Marshall

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting defendant's arrest photograph into evidence. The…