Opinion
B166137.
10-1-2003
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERIK BRISENO, Defendant and Appellant.
Law Offices of Pritz & Associates and Kurt J. Pritz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant and appellant Erik Briseno appeals from the judgment following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of one count of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 211) and two counts of attempted second degree burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 211), and the personal use of a firearm allegation was found true (Pen. Code, § 12022.53, subd. (b)). He was sentenced to state prison for 13 years. We appointed counsel to represent him on appeal.
After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. Appellants counsel advised him he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. On August 25, 2003, we advised appellant he had 30 days within which to file a supplemental brief. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and no arguable issues exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 760-763]; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: TURNER, P, J., MOSK, J.