From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brink

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 2, 2015
124 A.D.3d 1419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-01-2

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald BRINK, Defendant–Appellant.


MEMORANDUM:

Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal, specifically, whether the court erred when it failed to comply with CPL 310.30 in regard to jury note # 3. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. The order of November 12, 2010 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo ( see People v. LeFrois, 151 A.D.2d 1046, 544 N.Y.S.2d 508). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before April 2, 2015.

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brink

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jan 2, 2015
124 A.D.3d 1419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Brink

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald BRINK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 2, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 1419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 198
999 N.Y.S.2d 905

Citing Cases

People v. Brink

On a prior appeal, this Court modified the judgment by reducing the conviction of grand larceny to petit…