From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brillant

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 22, 2014
121 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-22

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lynda BRILLANT, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Camille O'Hara Gillespie, and Avshalom Yotam of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York N.Y. (Kathleen Whooley of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Camille O'Hara Gillespie, and Avshalom Yotam of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of Supreme Court, Kings County (Ozzi, J.), rendered September 28, 2011, convicting her of assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review her contention that her conviction of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00[1] ) was not supported by legally sufficient evidence ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor ( see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902). MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brillant

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 22, 2014
121 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Brillant

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lynda BRILLANT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
121 A.D.3d 1010
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7173

Citing Cases

People v. Brillant

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 121 AD3d 1010 (Kings)…