From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Briggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 5, 1992

Appeal from the Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: The circumstances of defendant's failure to appear at sentencing constituted a waiver of his right to be present, and the court properly sentenced him in absentia (see, People v. Robinson, 181 A.D.2d 983; cf., People v. Rice, 156 A.D.2d 925, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 923). Defendant was warned when sentencing was adjourned that the court would not be bound by the one to three year promised sentence if he did not appear on the adjourned date, and he was further advised that the maximum term of imprisonment is four years. The court did not err, therefore, in imposing the maximum sentence (see, People v. Riverside, 168 A.D.2d 647, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 966; see also, People v. Thompson, 174 A.D.2d 1007, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 1082). The fine imposed by the court must be vacated, however, because defendant was not told that he would also be fined if he failed to appear (see, People v. Rosenberg, 148 A.D.2d 346). The claimed improprieties concerning the presentence report have not been preserved for our review (see, People v. Walworth, 167 A.D.2d 622; People v Morton, 142 A.D.2d 763).


Summaries of

People v. Briggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Briggs

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. D. SCOTT BRIGGS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Karlas

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for…

People v. Hines

Contrary to the contention of defendant, Supreme Court clearly and unambiguously warned him on February 4,…