From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bresiac

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Jan 18, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570006/17

01-18-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean BRESIAC, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Eugene M. Guarino, J. at plea; Heidi C. Cesare, J. at sentencing), rendered December 8, 2016, affirmed.

Defendant seeks an "interest of justice" reduction in the probationary period imposed in accordance with his plea agreement. "Ordinarily ... where defendant effects a plea bargain and receives the precise sentence that was promised, he should not later be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" ( People v. Fair , 33 AD3d 558, 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007], quoting People v. Chambers , 123 AD2d 270, 270 [1986] ). Given the serious nature of the charged conduct and the absence of extraordinary circumstances, it cannot be said that the sentence of three years' probation was either harsh or excessive (see People v. Higgins , 19 AD3d 877 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 828 [2005] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

People v. Bresiac

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Jan 18, 2019
62 Misc. 3d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Bresiac

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean BRESIAC…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Date published: Jan 18, 2019

Citations

62 Misc. 3d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
112 N.Y.S.3d 865