From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bresciano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 10, 1990
165 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 10, 1990

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Having previously failed to seek to withdraw his plea of guilty, the defendant may not now, on appeal, attempt to do so for the first time (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). In any event, we find that the plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily offered (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9) during an allocution in which the defendant admitted his guilt to the instant burglary. Moreover, the restitution imposed by the court was consented to by the defendant and was in satisfaction of other criminal charges (Penal Law § 60.27). Finally, the sentence imposed, which was the minimum allowable under the circumstances, was agreed upon by the defendant as part of his plea and thus may not be challenged as excessive (People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bresciano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 10, 1990
165 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Bresciano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH BRESCIANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 10, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Willingham

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty, with the…

People v. Solerwitz

We further reject the defendant's contention that the court exceeded its statutory authority by directing…