From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brazzley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2001
287 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted September 17, 2001.

October 1, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered July 8, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Kathryn E. Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Daniel E. Wenner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court improperly marshaled the evidence during its identification charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10). In any event, the court properly referred to some of the identification evidence in order to explain the legal principles applicable to the case (see, CPL 300.10; People v. Simpson, 270 A.D.2d 507).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suite, 90 A.D.2d 80).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brazzley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 2001
287 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Brazzley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. KALESE BRAZZLEY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 849

Citing Cases

People v. Echevarria

As defendant correctly concedes, by failing to object to the jury charge, he failed to preserve for our…