Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside No. RIF122751, Janet I. Kintner, Judge. (Retired judge of the San Diego Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.)
O'ROURKE, J.
Anthony Charles Bray entered a negotiated guilty plea to evading an officer with reckless driving (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)) and admitted serving five prior prison terms (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)) and having three strikes (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)). Pursuant to the plea agreement, the court dismissed two of the strikes and sentenced Bray to 11 years in prison: six years (twice the upper term) for evading and one year for each prison prior. Bray appeals. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On April 3, 2005, a police officer activated his patrol car's siren and lights in an attempt to stop Bray. Bray evaded the officer by driving with wanton and willful disregard for the safety of persons and property.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel lists, as a possible but not arguable issue, whether Bray's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary.
We granted Bray permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issue listed pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Bray has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
WE CONCUR: HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.HALLER, J.