From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Branigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends, among other things, that the People improperly failed to give required notice, pursuant to CPL 710.30, of a showup conducted on a subway platform and a later showup at the police precinct. However, since the complaint had spontaneously identified the defendant on the street, the subway and precinct showups were merely confirmatory, not requiring notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (see, People v. Wilkins, 190 A.D.2d 874; People v. Duffy, 152 A.D.2d 704; cf., People v Sanford, 184 A.D.2d 671).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Branigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Branigan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALROY BRANIGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 231

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

Ordered that the amended judgments are affirmed. The Supreme Court properly determined that the People's…

People v. Kershaw

The complainant, who had served as a police officer in the Dominican Republic and as part of his training,…