From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brandon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 14, 1997.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Defendant has not demonstrated that he was deprived of a fair trial by less than meaningful representation. "[A] simple disagreement with strategies, tactics or the scope of possible cross-examination, weighed long after the trial, does not suffice" to satisfy defendant's burden of establishing ineffective assistance of counsel ( People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 187; see, People v Benn, 68 NY2d 941, 942). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Brandon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1997
237 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Brandon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CRAIG S. BRANDON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 980 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 1004

Citing Cases

People v. Timmons

The record establishes that defense counsel provided a vigorous defense, locating and presenting two…

People v. Lowe

Defendant has not demonstrated that he was denied a fair trial by less than meaningful representation ( see,…