From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Branch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2001
281 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued January 30, 2001.

March 5, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered July 6, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court, imposed February 24, 2000.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Florence M. Sullivan, and Thomas M. Ross of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment and resentence are affirmed.

The defendant's remarks at the time of his original sentencing on July 6, 1999, did not constitute a motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis of an unreasonable delay in sentencing. Accordingly, the defendant's contention that the indictment should be dismissed for this reason is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Richardson, 262 A.D.2d 427; People v. Marshall, 228 A.D.2d 15; People v. Thompson, 193 A.D.2d 841). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Branch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2001
281 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Branch

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. DESHAUN BRANCH, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 550

Citing Cases

People v. Young

, People v. Covell, 276 A.D.2d 824). Also, the remarks of the defendant's attorney concerning the alleged…

People v. Cecere

The defendant's remarks at the time of sentencing did not constitute a motion to dismiss the indictment on…