From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brakefield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1989
156 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 20, 1989

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not in custody when he gave his statement to the police. Thus, the court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the statement even though the police were aware that defendant was represented by counsel on an unrelated charge (see, People v Hauswirth, 89 A.D.2d 357, affd 60 N.Y.2d 904).

The introduction of photographs depicting the injuries to the deceased victim was proper to corroborate defendant's statement and to prove defendant's intent in inflicting the injuries. Photographs that are otherwise properly admitted as tending to prove a material fact are admissible even though they "`portray a gruesome spectacle and may tend to arouse passion and resentment against the defendant in the minds of the jury'" (People v Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356, 369-370, cert denied 416 U.S. 905).

Neither the alleged misconduct by the prosecutor nor his use of leading questions warrants reversal. In view of the overwhelming proof of guilt, those errors, if any, were harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).


Summaries of

People v. Brakefield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1989
156 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Brakefield

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM BRAKEFIELD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
549 N.Y.S.2d 288

Citing Cases

People v. Stebbins

We disagree. The photograph was probative on the issue of penetration, corroborated the infant victim's…

People v. Ryan

Also without merit are defendant's claims that the indictment was defective because it failed to allege…