From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 16, 1993

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The finding of the suppression court that defendant voluntarily and knowingly waived his right against self-incrimination was supported by the testimony at the hearing. Defendant had extensive experience with the criminal justice system and his inquiry about what would happen if he talked to the police did not indicate that he misunderstood the rights that were read to him. The record fails to demonstrate that defendant suffered any prejudice as a result of the court's charge on the function of an indictment or the court's marshalling of the evidence. Contrary to defendant's contention, his sentence is not harsh and excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID BRADLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 570

Citing Cases

People v. East

The defendant then knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his rights. ( People v. Bradley, 195…