From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Boyko

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Sep 18, 2012
No. E054488 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 18, 2012)

Opinion

E054488

09-18-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHAD ROBERT BOYKO, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for

publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


(Super.Ct.No. FVI1002448)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION


[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

The opinion herein, filed on September 11, 2012, is modified as follows:

1. Page 13, first sentence is deleted and replaced with:
There is no requirement in Government Code section 29550.1 of a finding of ability to pay. (See Govt. Code, § 29550.1.)
2. Page 13, third sentence of first full paragraph is deleted and replaced with:
In other words, Government Code section 29550 appears to apply to defendants arrested by officers of a county, and Government Code section 29550.2 applies to arrests by a "governmental entity not specified in Section
29550 or 29550.1." (Govt. Code, § 29550.2; Pacheco, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at p. 1399, fn. 6.)

There is no change in the judgment.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

HOLLENHORST

J.
We concur: RAMIREZ

P. J.
KING

J.


Summaries of

People v. Boyko

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Sep 18, 2012
No. E054488 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 18, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Boyko

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHAD ROBERT BOYKO, Defendant and…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

Citations

No. E054488 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 18, 2012)