Opinion
2012-06-15
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tyrae BOX, Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered June 5, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree. Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Philip Rothschild of counsel), for defendant–appellant. William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered June 5, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.
Frank H. Hiscock Legal Aid Society, Syracuse (Philip Rothschild of counsel), for defendant–appellant. William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (James P. Maxwell of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10[1] ), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although we agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because the minimal inquiry made by County Court was “insufficient to establish that the court ‘engage[d] the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” ( People v. Brown, 296 A.D.2d 860, 745 N.Y.S.2d 368,lv. denied98 N.Y.2d 767, 752 N.Y.S.2d 7, 781 N.E.2d 919;see People v. Hamilton, 49 A.D.3d 1163, 1164, 856 N.Y.S.2d 375), we nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.