From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bowman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-31-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gene BOWMAN, Appellant.

Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant, and appellant pro se. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Brittany L. Grome of counsel), for respondent.


Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Brittany L. Grome of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ.

DEVINE, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Lynch, J.), rendered June 2, 2014, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of rape in the first degree.

Defendant appeals from a jury verdict convicting him of rape in the first degree. He raises a variety of arguments on appeal, including that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request for access to the medical and psychiatric records of the victim (see People v. McCray, 23 N.Y.3d 193, 198, 989 N.Y.S.2d 649, 12 N.E.3d 1079 [2014] ; People v. Gissendanner, 48 N.Y.2d 543, 548, 423 N.Y.S.2d 893, 399 N.E.2d 924 [1979] ). Those records were subpoenaed and reviewed in camera by County Court, which determined that they contained no material and relevant information and sealed them. While the sealed records were supposedly provided to this Court, they do not appear to include many of the documents referenced and reviewed by County Court, and we can only say with confidence that we have the documents designated by County Court as exhibit No. 3. Thus, inasmuch as the present record does not permit us to review defendant's contention, and he cannot be faulted for failing to prepare a proper appellate record under the circumstances, "we hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to [County] Court to conduct a reconstruction hearing with respect to the missing records" (People v. Fullen, 118 A.D.3d 1297, 1298, 987 N.Y.S.2d 290 [2014] ; see People v. Russell, 48 A.D.3d 900, 901, 852 N.Y.S.2d 411 [2008] ; cf. People v. Cortijo, 254 A.D.2d 125, 125, 680 N.Y.S.2d 208 [1998], lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 1030, 684 N.Y.S.2d 495, 707 N.E.2d 450 [1998] ).

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, and matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.

McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bowman

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 31, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Bowman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gene BOWMAN, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 31, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1484 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2482
27 N.Y.S.3d 898

Citing Cases

People v. Kiah

We conclude that Supreme Court erred when it declined to order production of the victim's mental health…

People v. Chappell

However, we cannot determine from the record whether defendant had an opportunity to review the verdict sheet…