From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bowen

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1875
49 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1875)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court, Solano County.

         The defendant was charged in the indictment with having assaulted one Lena Hanna, a girl under ten years of age, with intent to commit a rape. On the trial, the prosecution called one Totten as a witness, and, against the objections of the defendant, were permitted to prove by him declarations of the defendant that he had had intercourse with other girls under ten years of age, but their names were not given. The defendant was convicted, and appealed.

         COUNSEL

          O. R. Coghlan, for the Appellant, cited Roscoe's Crim. Ev. p. 86; People v. Jones , 31 Cal. 565; and State v. Shuford, 1 Green's Crim. R. 247.

         G. A. Blanchard, for the People.


         OPINION          By the Court:

         At the trial, the Court allowed the prosecution, against defendant's objection, to introduce in evidence the declarations of defendant concerning his misconduct with other young girls. The Attorney-General admits that this was error, and we agree with the Attorney-General.

         Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

People v. Bowen

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1875
49 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1875)
Case details for

People v. Bowen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. Z. W. BOWEN

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1875

Citations

49 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1875)

Citing Cases

People v. Wyett

But neither that case, nor any other case to which our attention has been called, which upholds the admission…

People v. Stewart

There is an exception to the rule which allows proof of other acts, in some exceptional cases, in order to…